Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

Letter to the Editor: Free speech at CSUS

Ryan Christensen

Issue date: 5/9/07 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
RE: Free Speech at CSUS

Dear Editor,

On Thursday, April 24th, the Sacramento State College Republicans hosted Ward Connerly as a guest speaker during their regular general meeting. Ward Connerly, a former UC regent, Sacramento State alumni, and former ASI student body president, has become controversial in California in recent years because of his views on race. He believes that the government should not treat citizens different on account of race, whether that be through discrimination, or elevation, such as affirmative action programs.

What was meant to be a civil meeting, which a speech by Mr. Connerly followed by a short question and answer period by the members of the club, turned into a chaotic scene due to the presence of angry protestors. The campus community needs to be made aware of the audacity of the protestors, as well as the blatant disregard of the right to free speech on this campus by their group.

The purpose of this letter is not to say who is right and who is wrong in the issues addressed by Mr. Connerly, but rather, to address the conduct of a group of Sacramento State students. It is a wonderful thing that widespread free speech and healthy political debate is prevalent in this country. By default, citizens in this country know they can indulge in free speech practices, even if they might conflict with the ideas of someone else. That's our way of life, coming directly from the U.S. Constitution.

Before the meeting started, a large group of protestors marched in front of the meeting room in the University Union and chanted slogans such as "Hey hey, ho ho, Ward Connerly has got to go" and "terminate the meeting!" Many held up billboards with inflammatory messages. They banged on the walls with force in an effort to disrupt the meeting. With consultation from student activities, the club learned that since the meetings were advertised as welcome to willing students on their website, the student protestors had the right to enter the meeting. When the meeting started the protesters engulfed the room with their large crowd, chants, and slogans, obviously refusing to sit down and let the College Republicans have a civil meeting. They marched in straight to the guest speaker, and began to verbally attack him not even four feet where he was standing. During the initial protest argument to ward, they once again began to chant "terminate the meeting!"

Repeated requests by the College Republican President for the protesting crowd to have a seat and engage in civil discourse where ignored. Ward, not being intimidated by the crowd, began his speech to the group regardless. The protesting students treated the guest speaker in a despicable uncivilized fashion. They cut him off when we was talking, shouted inflammatory comments to him when he responded to questions in a manner the crowd didn't agree with, and used several profane words, such as the "F" word, while addressing this distinguished Sacramento State Alumni. Members of the College Republicans were told to "shut up" by the crowd in one instance.

If this group of students thinks they can march around and "terminate" any meeting on campus simply because they do not agree with an issue, then they are gravely mistaken. Last time I checked, this campus was located in the United States, not in freedom-of-speech deprived North Korea, though the actions of the student protestors would have you believe we were there.

In light of this recent hijacking of the College Republicans general meeting by student protestors, I call upon Student Activities officials, University Union Officials, and members of the Administration to make efforts to prevent this sort of occurrence again. Student clubs/organizations should not be afraid to host a guest speaker lest they be totally disrespected by a group of students with opposing viewpoints, and ruin the meeting with attempts to "terminate the meeting."

-Ryan Christensen
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 10

Vitrious Eelo

posted 5/09/07 @ 3:16 PM PST

You and your fellow Republicans cannot ignore that disrespect was coming from both sides. I didn't want the meeting terminated at all, but you can't act like people from your organization weren't being disrespectful as well. (Continued…)

Joe Patterson

posted 5/10/07 @ 2:16 PM PST

Give me a break, Vitrious, the disrespect only was caused by the liberals blantant attempt to disrupt the meeting. Had the disrespectful people sat down, held their signs, asked informed questions, the CR's would have been a lot different. (Continued…)

Joe Student.

posted 5/12/07 @ 5:02 PM PST

Free speech in America? I think its time to look at reality and realize that speech is (And has been) controlled by those in power. This "independent" newspaper is a prime example of "free speech" being controlled by a slim few and priviledged to a few writers all under the control of an editor who (unfortunately, has his/her career on the line if they allow someone to truely speak out against their employer or advertisers). (Continued…)

JOAQUIN CASTANEDA

posted 5/14/07 @ 10:19 PM PST

First, Vitrious is right about O'Connerly's disrepect of students during the Q&A. Second this Free Speech at CSUS article made some questionable connects between the protesters and North Korea, Terrorism, and hijacking. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Mark

posted 5/17/07 @ 10:02 PM PST

Joaquin,

Who are you to decide what is "politically" or "socially" acceptable? Who died and made you King??? I read thru the 1st Amendment and could find no exception to free speech based upon what the receiver of said speech believes to be "socially" or "politically" acceptable. (Continued…)

Pro Free Speech

posted 6/09/07 @ 12:04 PM PST

Joaquin likes to demonize those whom he disagrees with rather than ingaging in intelligent debate. He deems those who respect our borders and our rule of law as "racist". (Continued…)

Sean King

posted 6/15/07 @ 4:31 PM PST

Either people are very naive or full of it. To think you can bring in this type of controversial figure and not create a scene bordering on pandemonium is unrealistic. (Continued…)

Kevin Eastman

posted 6/19/07 @ 12:13 PM PST

Ryan:
Well said. I wish I had known of the event.

Joaquin Castaneda:
I see you've chosen the route that most short-sighted illegal-immigrant apologists take, and accused those who believe in the rule of law of racism. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Print Edition

Online Features Section

Handling a breakup
Online Dating
Interview with Andrew Sean Greer
Hollywood Buzz No. 5 - The Oscar results
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - The 81st Oscars
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Local reggae artists sound off
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Mayday Parade interview
Lovedrug interview
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview

Advertisement