Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

No replacement for music albums

Paul Rios

Issue date: 11/28/07 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Media Credit: Paul Rios
[Click to enlarge]
Paul Rios
Paul Rios

Earlier this semester, I bought my first MP3 album. It was an unsatisfying experience.

Don't get me wrong, the process itself was pleasant. Within minutes of finding an album by the obscure Welsh post-punk band Datblygu, I owned the thing. Cheap, fast, secure. It was kind of awesome.

But something was missing. At first, I thought it was just the shrink wrap. Eventually, I came to a different conclusion. Up until that point, I hadn't realized how satisfying buying music could be. Call it a symptom of late-stage consumerism, whatever. But it seemed like buying an MP3 turned music shopping into a lifeless process.

Subconsciously, I've known this. That's probably why it took so long for me to toss my hard-earned dollars into the iTunes coffers. MP3s are just too disposable and fleeting. In a lot of ways, they turn our favorite music into superficial, ambient sound. A constant soundtrack to our lives, sure, but it comes at the expense of conscious intake of said soundtrack. Granted, pop music has often been contrary to introspection and intellectualization. But MP3s make it even easier to toss music aside.

Still, downloads are obviously becoming the preferred form of distribution by both the public and industry. Even if it took me a while to pay for a download, I've still got a hard drive filled with MP3s. And really, as much as I might resist, in at least a few ways it's a good thing.

The whole convenience factor is the most obvious benefit. I can stick a sixth of my digital music collection in my pocket when I leave home. That's pretty sweet. Walk around campus and sport the headphones. It would seem most people concur with stated sweetness. An MP3 is also at least a little more environmentally friendly. Once again, I'm reminded of that shrink wrap. But the whole process of pressing and distributing a release is pretty waste intensive.

The greatest benefit of downloading music, however, is its potential to reshape the music industry. Since the beginnings of recorded music, record labels have acted as intermediary between musician and audience. As British rockers Radiohead have shown though, it need not be that way.

The band removed the middleman from the equation when it put its new album "In Rainbows" on its website for download this past October. Radiohead gave folks two options: download the album at a modest bit-rate (for free or with an optional donation) or pay for a lavish vinyl boxset priced at roughly $80.

It's still too early to call the project a success or failure. While the album has been received warmly by fans and critics, the real numbers on who paid how much for what have not been released. A Web analyst firm called comScore reported that only 40 percent of the people who downloaded the album chose to pay for it. The average payment according to comScore was $6. But, as band representatives pointed out, comScore's numbers are based on speculative web tracking.

"As the album could only be downloaded from the band's website, it is impossible for outside organizations to have accurate figures on sales," representatives said.

If that 40 percent of the couple million people who downloaded the album only paid $6 a pop, that's still a lot of money. Since the band and associates did the legwork, there's no middleman to siphon some off the top. And if that wasn't enough, the band will release a CD version of the album next year.

Of course, Radiohead is an exceptional case. Most artists don't have the resources or exposure of a band like Radiohead. The real test will come when we hear results from other online distribution experiments, like the release of underground rapper Saul Williams' "The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust!" While some might be drawn to the album thanks to the involvement of Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor, it's still a Saul Williams album. And last time I checked, a Saul Williams release doesn't tend to capture the ears of the masses.

Anyway, in spite of all the neat things an MP3 revolution implies, I still have an illogical attachment to bulky media. I still want to rummage through dollar record bins and make mixtapes that are actually recorded on tape. But I guess I'll embrace digital music all the same. Even if it feels so… I don't know.

Empty.

Paul Rios can be reached at prios@statehornet.com.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Print Edition

Online Features Section

Handling a breakup
Online Dating
Interview with Andrew Sean Greer
Hollywood Buzz No. 5 - The Oscar results
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - The 81st Oscars
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Local reggae artists sound off
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Mayday Parade interview
Lovedrug interview
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview

Advertisement