Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

Out with the old, holding off on the new

Mikhail Chernyavsky

Issue date: 11/5/08 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
The beauty of being on a university campus every day is seeing the diversity of views of my fellow students. It is encouraging to see how outspoken people are about their beliefs. While there is no "wrong" opinion, there is an ignorant one.

I recently saw a person wearing one of my least favorite T-shirts. It was black with bold, white text that read: "Make Love, Not War."

By no means am I a violent person, but we need devastation in this world. Thomas Malthus explained in "An Essay on the Principle of Population" that in addition to old age, we need war, famine and disease to control our population. In the same way hunters help control the population of some animals in an area to keep it from overpopulating, Malthus' list does the same for human populations.

He believed that human population grew faster than we could produce supplies for survival. Thanks to the advancement of technology, we do not have to worry about production. Technology is now the new alcohol; the cause and solution to life's problems.

No longer are the weak subject to demise.

I cannot deny that technology is part of my survival. I wear corrective lenses. However, I can still see without them, unlike some friends who are virtually blind without them. In a war, if the blind did not fight, they would have been eliminated during the rape and pillage anyway.

Now before I am crucified for insensitivity, consider this: The current world population is 6.625 billion people, according to the Population Reference Bureau's "2007 World Population Data Sheet." The Bureau is a nonprofit organization that collects information on population, health and the environment. By the year 2050, it predicts that the earth's population will rise about 40 percent to 9.3 billion people. It doesn't accout for war, world hunger and disease.

For every 1000 people, there are 21 newborns and nine deaths each year. We are reproducing twice as fast as people are dying.

Now, I'm not saying we should start killing people, but stop keeping random people alive. The last thing we need is another cure to a deadly disease or an answer to a world problem.

In 2001, BBC Radio's World Service reported that every 3.6 seconds someone dies of hunger; that is about 8.76 million people per year. Now, imagine a place where world hunger is no more. By 2050, there would be an additional 367.92 million people to the 9.3 billion; this is also assuming that these new people would not "Make Love."

Because of medical advances, life is a lot easier. You sick? We have a pill for that. Your kidneys don't work? There is a machine for that. We do everything to prolong life, but at what point are people just living too long?

No matter how many cures we find, a new disease will always pop up.

The problem with us is that we love too much. We have a problem with wanting to keep our loved ones around forever. If this is a religious issue, then remember the good, old days of the Bible. They didn't have a dialysis machine for grandpa or an oxygen tank for grandma.

If it ever comes down to it, pull the plug on me. I'd rather you save your energy on the newborn that will take my place.

So please stop trying to save the world. If you do "make love," please use contraceptives.



Mikhail Chernyavsky can be reached at mikhail@statehornet.com
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

Charles

posted 11/12/08 @ 5:37 PM PST

I wonder if you would still have those sentiments when it's your mom or dad that's dying of cancer or has a failed kidney.

We don't have to continue wars or not cure diseases. (Continued…)

extremewit@yahoo.com

posted 11/14/08 @ 2:23 PM PST

I agree. But I think that we need to focus on the fact that stupid poor people are the ones doing most of the procreating. So guess don't worry about it. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Print Edition

Online Features Section

Handling a breakup
Online Dating
Interview with Andrew Sean Greer
Hollywood Buzz No. 5 - The Oscar results
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - The 81st Oscars
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Local reggae artists sound off
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Mayday Parade interview
Lovedrug interview
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview

Advertisement