Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

Faculty targeted

Sally King

Issue date: 12/3/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Student Daniel Savino sent a mass e-mail targeting professors that supported Prop. 8.
Media Credit: Andrew Nixon
Student Daniel Savino sent a mass e-mail targeting professors that supported Prop. 8.
[Click to enlarge]
Controversy surrounds a letter e-mailed by a Sacramento State student that targetted professors for their support on Proposition 8, the measure that banned same-sex marriage in California.

The letter was addressed specifically to four staff members: professors Sharon Peterson, Kenichiro Chinen, Andre Carlie and staff member Bonnie Smith, who all donated money to the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign. He also sent it to all faculty, staff and administrators on campus.

Daniel Savino, graduate student in international affairs, asked the professors to meet with him to discuss why they donated money to Prop. 8. He asked the professors why they believe some of their students and colleagues only deserve second-class rights.

In his letter, Savino says he disagrees with their private views, yet absolutely believes in their right to express them. He then states supporting Prop. 8 is different, that it does not exercise free speech, but is a majority taking rights from a minority.

Andre Carli said at first he thought the letter would get him fired. He had read about the artistic musical director for the California Musical Theatre, Scott Eckern, who resigned from his job because of the pressure he was under from the gay community for supporting Prop. 8 in the Sacramento Bee. Carli feared he would lose his job for donating money.

Savino said his goal was and remains to find common ground and allay any fear or concerns of Proposition 8. He feels Proposition 8 won because it was heavily driven by misinformation. He said had people been informed of the real issues, he sincerely doubts they would have voted for the measure.

Nick Burnett, chair of the communications department, said two things struck him when he received the letter. First, he had a concern to how people might react to the individual professors, and second, he had wanted to know if Savino sent the e-mail to students through class lists. Sending e-mails to class lists is illegal under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. This act prohibits data on students to be released. Having access to class lists would be a gross violation of the law, said Burnett.

Barbara O'Connor, communications professor, said she replied to Savino to find out what his reason was behind sending the e-mail to so many people. She said she did not get a response. O'Connor said she is OK with Savino attempting to talk with the professors, but not OK with sending the e-mail to the world.

In an interview with the State Hornet, in response to O'Connor's question as to why he sent the letter to so many people, Savino responded by saying, "I specifically said in the letter, this is not a witch-hunt. The professors who received this letter have misinterpreted my desire for robust dialogue."

"This was not an attempt to talk to professors but to embarrass them," O'Connor said.

O'Connor said this is a wholly unacceptable approach and everyone has the right to follow their political beliefs with contributions. This is part of free speech.

She said there is no question that who donated money to a political campaign is on the public record, but disagrees with how Savino used the information.

"I detected a little hostility in the letter," O'Connor said. "Wanting to talk people into changing their point of view will not happen by polarizing them. This is part of free speech and the democratic process."

Savino said originally he was upset and angry. When he reflected on this he said he realized anger is unproductive, that questioning is far more important than ranting.

"I firmly believe these actions (by the professors) shows they support second class rights for students and co-workers," Savino said.

Thomas Knutson, professor of communication studies, said he thinks what Savino did is disgusting.

Knutson said he is opposed to Proposition 8, but this was not the proper way to handle things. He said the courts are going to have to handle the issue and just because the majority votes on something does not make it right.

"That's why we have the system we have," Knutson said. "I am weary of the nastiness on both sides. There is no need for name-calling. It has no part when reasoning the issue."

Carli said he could not vote because he is a citizen of Italy. He contributed money because he wanted to support his belief that marriage is between a man and a woman. He said he does not hate gay people. He holds nothing against them. Carli felt Savino wanted him to be ashamed of what he did.

"I feel the letter was a way to try and make me feel disgraced because of all the people it was sent to," Carli said. "After receiving the letter, I felt as if I had a sign on my head saying I was a gay hater."

Carli said he had been receiving hate mail from the opponents of Proposition 8 prior to receiving the letter. He felt like he was being pulled into a war he had nothing to do with.

Carli does believe he is being used as an example as somebody for gay people to hate. He said if Savino just wanted to address the specific teachers who gave money to Proposition 8, he should not have sent it to his colleagues, the Sacramento Bee and others.

Carli said his department has been supportive of him. He has received letters from people who are opposed to Proposition 8 that support him too.

"Just because I have a different viewpoint, I should not be afraid of the law," Carli said.

Carli said he has friends with different opinions and sometimes they disagree, but still remain friends.

"If the people to whom I addressed my letter are unashamed of and secure in their views, there should be no problem. To talk of 'naming names' is to imply there is some reason to hide a view that, by virtue of their donations, is obviously strongly held," Savino said.

Nicole Bors, graduate student in speech and pathology, said she thought the letter was not tactful. She said there should be respect when addressing professors.

"I think the letter borders on invasion of privacy," Bors said.

Savino said this is all public record information and anyone with Internet access can find the information through the California Secretary of State's website.

Sharon Peterson did not wish to be interviewed because she felt any interview would only serve to give Savino the publicity he seeks and said the e-mail sent from Nick Burnett responding to Savino's e-mail sums up her feelings.

Burnett said he did not think Savino's intent was to stimulate a discussion.

Burnett said these monies are in fact federally protected contributions that are required to be made public. Of course, what is not required to be made public is calling these people to account for their political views to their colleagues, students and friends.

Burnett's letter went on to say, "Whatever your position was on Proposition 8, this tactic of attempting to 'out' these people to their students and colleagues is unproductive and rude. Whatever our political beliefs, we come together as a department to support each other and advance the goals of the department and the university."

In response to being accused of "outing" people, Savino said he supports individual beliefs and his intent was not to "out" people.

"I am sure that he imagines his action will embarrass or humiliate those singled out. There would be no other reason for such a widespread e-mail blast," Burnett said.

The dialogue, discussion and exchange of ideas are how we should function, Savino said.

"I feel strongly that if I had not personalized my letter, the impact would have been lost," Savino said.

Savino said he maintains hope and confidence that his professors will not judge him poorly for his deep and sincere commitment to equality. He said there is no best time or place to pursue civil rights.

"The people I care about are being forbidden from being with the person they love. Most of us know people that are gay. Their rights are affected by people who wish to limit their rights," Savino said.

Sally King can be reached at sking@statehornet.com
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 16

Brian San Diego

posted 12/03/08 @ 1:58 AM PST

Excellent Savino. If that instructor feels like he has a sign on his head that says gay hater, then he obviously IS ashamed of his own actions. There is a reason why campaign donations are made public. (Continued…)

Stephen Schwichow

posted 12/03/08 @ 9:33 AM PST

I give my full support to Daniel Savino for confronting bigotry at the source. I gave money to the No on 8 campaign and if someone wishes to take me to task, they are welcome to. (Continued…)

Michael Fitzgerald

posted 12/03/08 @ 10:39 AM PST

And by publishing this very long story, the State Hornet has now taken an incident that is several weeks old (and nearly forgotten) and brought it to the attention of the entire campus - at least that portion that reads the State Hornet. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Elizabeth Rowell

posted 12/03/08 @ 2:23 PM PST

I applaud Savino's letter in that it eloquently asks Prop 8 supporters why they support dicrimination. I read the letter and in my opinion it never once took on a hateful tone, instead it poured respect and curiousity as to why this battle is even a public debate that people vote on. (Continued…)

Randy Auer

posted 12/03/08 @ 5:36 PM PST

I am not certain that the previous posters supporting Savino's methods understand why pressuring someone about political contributions is a bad thing. (Continued…)

Sheryl Stoneking

posted 12/04/08 @ 8:26 AM PST

Would this have been printed if Prop 8 had not passed? I don't think so! I supported Prop 8 by volunteering around my neighborhood and I am proud that I stood up for what I believe! I voted YES and would do so again and again!! I don't hate homosexuals - I just don't agree with homosexualality!! Who people choose to sleep with, or have a relationship with has NO baring on that person's job, education, or anything except their own lifestyle and personal relationships. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Frankie

posted 12/04/08 @ 12:35 PM PST

Mr. Savino is to be commended. Not only did he show a huge amount of bravery for stepping out and calling these professors to task, but he also showed the kind of voice, leadership and thinking outside of the box that should be the hallmark of a graduate student. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Olive Yoo

posted 12/04/08 @ 10:36 PM PST

STUDENT TARGETED BY HORNET!!! Savino should sue the Hornet for publishing his letter, presuming he didn't give them permission. And where does Nick Burnett get the stones to defame Savino by implying his sending email was somehow criminal behavior? Are The Hornet and Nick "targeting" the grad student? Is it being done to "embarrass or humiliate" him? What a coup for free speech!

The Hornet's calling of Savino to public account for his political views is far more contemptible than anything their 'target' appears to have done. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Scott Speer

posted 12/08/08 @ 9:17 PM PST

McCarthyism? Since when is it right to promote witch-hunting?

Frank Loret de Mola

posted 12/10/08 @ 6:45 AM PST

1.) This letter, if not a witch hunt in content, was orchestrated to the public much in the same way as a witch hunt.

2.) I don't question the content. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Events Calendar

Sports Calendar

Poll

Would the Urban Village make Sac State less of a commuter school?
Submit Vote

View Results

Online Features Section

Handling a breakup
Online Dating
Interview with Andrew Sean Greer
Hollywood Buzz No. 5 - The Oscar results
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - The 81st Oscars
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Local reggae artists sound off
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Mayday Parade interview
Lovedrug interview
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview

Advertisement