Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

New year, legislators can't help economy

Jordan Guinn

Issue date: 1/7/09 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
While it is gratifying to put 2008 behind us, 2009 cannot be expected to be significantly better-especially in California. We are financially ruined and our state will be urinating red ink and shedding jobs for years to come. But greedy lenders, unqualified homeowners and a credit crisis cannot bear the full burden of blame for our state's economic incompetence.

We have thrown our wealth around with reckless abandon, and it finally is starting to hurt us. What's most horrifying in all of this is that rock-bottom is nowhere in sight.

Sadly, the state potentially running out of money on Feb. 1 isn't the floor of the abyss. Even if our diligent leaders in the state capitol manage to put partisan minutiae aside and bridge our budget gap, it only amounts to an overdue bandage. There is no way to completely and agreeably solve all of our state's issues in a matter of weeks.

California's size alone makes it a logistical nightmare, not to mention how we're vulnerable to a wide host of unpredictable natural disasters that can easily destroy any economic plan we may scrap together.

At any rate, anything legislators hammer out in the next month will only move the burden of debt deeper into the future while ensuring they aren't issued IOU's on payday.

Although things are bleak at home, there is one slight aspect of economic relief that we should all be able to look forward to in 2009: Susan Atkins, a.k.a. Sadie Mae Glutz, finally dying.

It's morbid, but it will take a slight burden off our backs and wallets. Even though her assorted bills are proportionately small, considering our financial crisis, every penny saved helps.

As of July 2008, the California taxpayer had already shelled out over a million dollars on her medical bills. It costs roughly three grand a day for guards to protect her, according to her lawyer's statements.

She is a miserable shrew who has earned every horrific thing that has happened to her. She has been diagnosed with terminal brain cancer and recently had one of her legs amputated. She was denied a compassionate release in July of last year.

She has been lounging in our state's prison system since 1971. No woman has been incarcerated in California longer. She was initially sentenced to the death penalty, and she easily earned it, but California's Supreme Court outlawed the practice in 1972. The frumpy former stripper was one of the cult members who participated in the grisly Tate-LaBianca murders in 1969 due to the brainwashing abilities of Charles Manson.

My word count for this column is too low to report all the despicable actions of Atkins and the rest of the Manson family. Suffice to say she does not deserve to be afforded the slightest bit of human dignity, especially during our economic hardships. The idea that she has a dry place to sleep at night and better healthcare than hordes of us is infuriating, considering the financial headaches state-run daycare centers and infrastructure projects are having.

Yes, Atkins has converted to Christianity and has tried to mentor other inmates. She says that she is truly repentant and has begged for mercy. But that doesn't bring her victims back. It also doesn't change the fact that she committed these murders because she wanted to spark and apocalyptic race war.

Most likely, she spends her days drooling and waiting for caretakers to wipe caked filth from her crevices. We have paid handsomely for her cancer treatments as well as protective custody and will continue to do so until she needs embalming fluid. But she almost assuredly will stop breathing this year, that's something to look forward to.

Jordan Guinn can be reached at jguinn@statehornet.com
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Viewing Comments 1 - 4 of 4

Dennis

posted 1/08/09 @ 11:56 AM PST

This is well written. I agree fully with your view point on Susan Atkins. I hear of way too many people that say "Ohhh these murders took place nearly 40 years ago, let the poor woman free". (Continued…)

Terry Martin

posted 1/21/09 @ 8:58 PM PST

This is interesting, and I agree that things will not be fixed this upcoming year. Rock bottom may come anywhere between tomorrow and forever.

Rorschach

posted 1/23/09 @ 4:46 PM PST

So we kill Atkins and solve our budget crisis? Get real you moron.

Eran Gafni

posted 2/01/09 @ 6:38 AM PST

I think what you have wrote about Susan is vicious and evil. I though the same as you until a few years ago, but learning more about the case I know definitely 3 things:
1. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Print Edition

Online Features Section

Handling a breakup
Online Dating
Interview with Andrew Sean Greer
Hollywood Buzz No. 5 - The Oscar results
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - The 81st Oscars
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Local reggae artists sound off
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Mayday Parade interview
Lovedrug interview
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview

Advertisement