Quantcast The State Hornet
College Media Network

Get macromedia Flash Player

Sometimes swearing is needed to make a point

Matt Rascher

Issue date: 4/15/09 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Media Credit: Megan Harris
[Click to enlarge]
Click here to listen to the podcast.

The first time I ever ate a bar of soap was when I was 8 years old. Tears silently ran down my face as the stinging sensation in my mouth quickly grew. My molars were digging grooves into this bar of Ivory discipline, and I knew at that moment I would never, ever swear in front of my mom again.



The F-word, and every other dirty word we know, is fun to say for some, but annoy and irritate others. They can imply an unintelligent tone while speaking and degrade people at the same time. These are words you should never use around your grandma, in church, in line at the grocery store or while meeting someone's parents for the first time.

Well, you know what I say to that? F--- it.

These obscene words only have the power they do because we give it to them. If I stubbed my toe and shouted out, "FUDGE!" People may giggle or ask if I'm OK. But if I was in the same situation and shouted out a different F-word, I'd get dirty looks and be asked to leave. The problem lies with our instilled sense of morals.

Part of the lure of even using these words is the fact that they're so wrong to use. For most of us, we're taught from childhood not to ever use bad language. It's bad for kids and only something the most cretinous adults do. That taboo is what drives the adolescent mind to embrace swearing.

There's a primal and guttural satisfaction involved when you ramble off a line of these sinfully gratifying words. If, for instance, I just got an A on a test when I wasn't expecting it, I wouldn't say, "Oh golly gee, I just feel wonderful about my exam score!" I would pump my fist, bring my head back and release an emphatic and resounding "F--- YEAH!"

Context plays an important role as well. The situation in which the word is being used controls how much power and actual vulgarity is put into the word.

"The word itself is just sort of a forwarding address, or it's an indicator of the context around it," said John Clark, associate professor of English. "The word f--- didn't have its power until it was used in enough situations to where it acquires its taboo."

Context is important when racially or sexually degrading terms are used as well. While I am all for the use of swear words, there is a difference between a well placed F-bomb and words used to demean people.

In particular, the N-word has created a lot of controversy with its usage, not only in America, but all over the world. According to the African American Registry, a non-profit education organization, this word more than any other word captures the personal hatred and racism directed toward blacks. The controversy of this word arises because of its dual meanings. It is commonly used in a friendly way between some black people, but unfortunately also in a completely derogatory way. The word can be used both ways, but who is to decide if either of them should even be used?

Another word facing scrutiny is queer. Once used as a way to describe something as strange, it is now used as a way to describe homosexual people. It is still used by many in a derogatory way, but in the gay community, like with the N-word in the black community, it has adopted a dual meaning - one positive, one negative. But should either be used?

With the use of one kind of foul language, we can vent our frustrations or bask in the triumph of an accomplishment. With the use of the other kind of words we can demean and negate the importance of people. When it comes to deciding how to use this kind of language, there are many questions to ponder.

It is a fine line that we walk, or speak, but no matter what I say, or anyone else for that matter, I'm sure a lot of you out there just don't give a f---.

Matt Rascher can be reached at mrascher@statehornet.com
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Click here to view the State Hornet's comment guidelines.
Comments do not appear immediately.

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Get macromedia Flash Player

Advertisement

Print Edition

Online Features Section

Handling a breakup
Online Dating
Interview with Andrew Sean Greer
Hollywood Buzz No. 5 - The Oscar results
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - The 81st Oscars
Sac in Stereo No. 19 - What makes a great singer?
Hollywood Buzz No. 4 - Classic Christmas Movies
Sac in Stereo No. 18 - Haven't I heard this song before?
Sexcapades No. 7 - Dating your co-worker or your boss
Hollywood Buzz No. 3 - Romantic Comedies
Sac in Stereo No. 17 - Eclectic additions for any record collection
Sexcapades No. 6 - Why men and women date
Sac in Stereo No. 16 - Dillinger Four CD review, worldwide Thriller dance, Prince's secret message
Sac in Stereo No. 15 - Mixtapes and D.Willz live in the studio
Sac in Stereo No. 14 - Soundtracks for the Obama and McCain campaigns
Hollywood Buzz No. 2 - Indie and DVD gems
Sac in Stereo No. 13 - Don't call it a comeback! Should Metallica, AC/DC, Journey and LL Cool J stay or go?
Hollywood Buzz No. 1 - Summer Blockbusters
Sac in Stereo No. 12 - We (almost) interview Kanye, Justin and Amy Winehouse
Sexcapades No. 5 - Going for home base on the first date; avoiding psychos
Sac in Stereo No. 11 - Turntablism v. mashups; Coachella recap
Sac in Stereo No. 10 - Mariah Carey: bigger than the Beatles?
Sac in Stereo No. 9 - Hip-hop meets rock culture; interview and freestlye with rapper D.Willz
Sac in Stereo No. 8 - The state of the Sacramento scene (with KWOD's Andy Hawk)
Sac in Stereo No. 7 - The most overrated artists
Sexcapades No. 4 - The safe Spring-Break hookup
Sac in Stereo No. 5 - Guilty pleasures from the CD bin
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 3 - The ugliest, most drugged-up celebrities we love
Sac in Stereo No. 4 - The top artists to watch for in 2008
Sexcapades No. 3 - Sleeping together without staying together
Sac In Stereo No. 3 - The worst albums from our favorite artists
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 2 - Who was hottest at the Oscars?
Sac in Stereo No. 2 - Is music more accessible in this generation?
Celebrity Wrap-Up No. 1 - Does Britney Spears smell; exploiting celebrities' children
Sac in Stereo No. 1 - Why form a side project? Can local musicians even make money?
Sexcapades No. 2 - Proper anal etiquette; watching porn as a couple
Reel Talk No. 7 - Oscarbation
Reel Talk: No. 6 - The dying drive-in
Sexcapades podcast: Hornet relationships and sex: No. 1
Reel Talk: Episode 5 - That annoying guy in the theater
Sex Ed(itors) - Episode 4: Mistakes women make in bed
Reel Talk: Episode 3 - Who's hot in film?
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 3 - Kinky relationships
Rapping with Kingspade's Johnny Richter
Sex Ed(itors): Episode 2 - Fetishes
Reel Talk: Episode 2 - Cult Classics
Reel Talk: Episode 1 - Summer movies
Sex Ed(itors) : Episode 1 - Oral Sex
Local reggae artists sound off
The Dimes to flip in for nooner
Jello to slide into Union Ballroom on Monday
Mayday Parade interview
Lovedrug interview
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus interview

Advertisement